The Media Co-op

Local Independent News

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!

Groups Across Canada Call For An Inquiry Into The Future Of Nuclear Power

by Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility


March 31 2011
For Immediate Release

Three Mile Island taught us all that nuclear power is inherently dangerous. With Chernobyl the whole world witnessed the awesome power of a total nuclear meltdown. At Fukushima we are seeing simultaneous partial meltdowns in 3 reactors and 4 spent fuel pools....

Canada's reactors have a different design, but the potential for catastrophe is ever present. It was not an earthquake and tsunami that caused Japan's nuclear catastrophe -- it was the resulting total electrical blackout at the plant: the loss of onsite and offsite power. Such a blackout can be caused in a variety of ways....

Like other countries, Canada needs to reassess the risks and benefits of nuclear technology. This is too important a matter for nuclear engineers alone; it must be a societal decision.

Federal political parties are being challenged by groups across Canada to declare their support for a far-reaching non-partisan Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Future of Nuclear Power in Canada, independent of the nuclear industry and the CNSC, to be launched at the earliest possible date.

As part of that inquiry process, the groups are asking that no new licenses for nuclear power plants – whether new build projects or refurbishment projects, or off-site transportation of nuclear wastes produced by nuclear reactors – be granted until the Royal Commission has concluded its work.

Groups from across Canada are joining together in this appeal in hopes that the people of Canada will be adequately consulted on the future of this inherently dangerous industry. “The basic question is this: do Canadians wish nuclear power production to be expanded or to be phased out?” said Gordon Edwards, President of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility.

“The endorsing groups are unanimous in their view that the Canadian Nuclear Industry, the Canadian Regulatory Regime and the Canadian and Provincial governments have failed to disseminate sufficient objective scientific information about the hazards of nuclear reactors, the specific health dangers of radioactive exposures, and the potential ecological consequences of major reactor malfunctions, in language that citizens and decision-makers can readily understand,” said Michel Duguay, coordinator of le Mouvement Sortons le Québec du Nucléaire.

These groups are also unanimous in their feeling that political accountability and transparency has been insufficient in the nuclear field, as governments have often seemed to depend almost exclusively on the advice of the Canadian nuclear industry and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, without a sufficiently open and democratic process at the political level.

These groups feel that the risks of nuclear power should be assessed not only from the point of view of the physicists and engineers who populate the Canadian nuclear industry and its licensing agency, the CNSC, but also by independent bio-medical experts and people trained in the fields of biology and ecology, as well as experts drawn from the social sciences, who are independent of any promotional bias, and by our democratic institutions of government.

“Most importantly, however, the groups feel that ordinary citizens must have an opportunity to voice their views on nuclear power and to explore the implications of alternative non-nuclear energy technologies and strategies” said Michel Fugère of le Mouvement Vert Mauricie.

Before proceeding any further down the nuclear path, we ask the Canadian government to finally give ordinary Canadians a chance to debate the risks and benefits of nuclear power in relation to its alternatives in a politically meaningful forum.

Additional Background Material:

(1) List of endorsing groups as of March 31 2011: www.ccnr.org/list.pdf

(2) “Meltdowns in CANDU reactors”: www.ccnr.org/Melt_CANDU.pdf

(3) CNSC safety concerns about CANDUs: www.ccnr.org/concerns.pdf

Contacts:

Gordon Edwards, Ph.D., CCNR President,              (514) 839 7214

Michel Duguay Ph.D., MSQN Coordinator,              (418) 802 2740

Michel Fugère, Mouvmeent Vert Mauricie (MVM),    (819) 532 2073

see list (www.ccnr.org/list.pdf) for contacts in various provinces

Socialize:
Want more grassroots coverage?
Join the Media Co-op today.

About the poster

Trusted by 3 other users.
Has posted 1 times.
View Ahni's profile »

Recent Posts:


Ahni ()

Member since April 2009

About:

I maintain the blog intercontinentalcry.org pretty much full time, to help people stay informed of issues concerning land rights and struggles around the world. I also help out with oneidasfordemocracy.org

631 words

Comments

Nuclear plants = proliferation

The fundamental reason for shutting down all the nuclear power plants in the world is to lessen the opportunities for more nations to build their own nuclear weapons.

In theory, we can always make tomorrow's nuclear plants somewhat safer than today's, if we want to spend even more money. The abstract debate over "how safe is safe" can go on indefinitely. And we know that corporations have spent hundreds of millions of dollars on public relations campaigns designed to trick us into thinking that nuclear reactors were "green." Not to speak of the equally large sums which the industry has spent on lobbying governments, and buying loyalty from elected officials with campaign contributions. (For more on the nuclear mindset, see Nukespeak.)

What we can't do, for any amount of money, is break the unbreakable bond between nuclear power and nuclear weapons. Atoms for peace, atoms for war, the atoms don't know the difference.

As long as the world's governments cling to the fiction that humans can build institutions that can keep nuclear power and nuclear weapons separated, we will be facing nation after nation doing exactly what India, Pakistan, North Korea, etc. have done, using their nuclear power programs to hide their development of nuclear weapons.

Nuclear power plants, horrendous though they be in close proximity, are but mere pimples on the planet compared to the horror of a thermonuclear weapon going off in a major city.

We need a double zero campaign: a truly safe planet would be one with no nuclear power plants and no nuclear weapons. Let's leave the uranium in the ground!

Join the media co-op today
Things the Media Co-op does: Support
Things the Media Co-op does: Report
Things the Media Co-op does: Network
Things the Media Co-op does: Educate
Things the Media Co-op does: Discover
Things the Media Co-op does: Cooperate
Things the Media Co-op does: Build
Things the Media Co-op does: Amplify

User login


Google+
Subscribe to the Dominion $25/year

The Media Co-op's flagship publication features in-depth reporting, original art, and the best grassroots news from across Canada and beyond. Sign up now!