The Media Co-op

Local Independent News

More independent news:
Do you want free independent news delivered weekly? sign up now
Can you support independent journalists with $5? donate today!

A Common Plan

Could participatory design work for the Halifax Common?

by jayme melrose

The Halifax Common will be used for more big name concerts, according to HRM's plan.  What would a people's plan look like?  Photo: Katie McKay
The Halifax Common will be used for more big name concerts, according to HRM's plan. What would a people's plan look like? Photo: Katie McKay

“No planner worth their salt would make a planning decision without consulting the public first,” says Maureen Ryan, a senior planner with HRM.  But in January of this year, when HRM presented their plan for spending $3 million dollars on the Halifax North Common, the 'consultation' was little more than an information session, where residents had the opportunity to submit written comments. 

Even if a meaningful consultation had taken place, some citizens, academics, and community planners agree that consultation is not enough.  They say the planning process, especially for a public space like the Halifax Common, can and should be done in a collaborative and participatory manner.   

“We need to develop a vision together first,” says Kate MacKay of the Cities and Environment Unit, a team of community planners that has helped dozens of First Nations communities develop their own community visions.  “The vision has to be tangible and action oriented.”  The community vision can then inform decisions, such as how the Halifax Common should be used.

“Community visions develop genuine engagement,” says MacKay.  “They are locally focused and focus on capacity building.  This is more important than ever.  We have so much local talent.”

Most public input opportunities consist of a presentation of sorts followed by an opportunity to ask questions or make comments.  Letters can also be sent to councillors and newspapers.

 “You go to the forums, speak your few minutes, write your letters, - and then you have no idea who gets them or what happens to that information,” says Pam deNicola, a long-time activist for the protection of farmlands and watershed in her West Haunts community.

Most opportunities for input are one-way and one-time-only; there is rarely space for dialogue or for ideas and concerns to evolve.  

“At the basic level, people need to feel heard,” says Maureen Ryan, who is heading up a design process that goes against the trend of meaningless consultation.  Ryan is senior planner on the Fall River Community Vision project. “[Participants] need to know their input was taken into account in decision making.”

Community Visions are a lengthy process offered through HRM's Community Planning department.  The goal is to work closely with residents to develop a plan for the aesthetic, economic, and physical direction for their community.   This vision then becomes their policy document.

“These people [residents of Fall River] are very capable,” says Ryan, who believes it’s not the job of planners to make the design decisions for a community. “Planners are here to help determine financial and technical feasibility of their ideas, and to ensure residents have the community development skills to carry out their projects.”

The Imagine Bloomfield Society used similar process to create a vision for the Bloomfield Centre when the future of the centre was in jeopardy.  The project and process were resident-directed and every attempt was made to involve as many residents as possible.  Instead of seeking feedback on a particular vision, the Society asked people to contribute their own vision. 

The outcome?  Imagine Bloomfield created a feasibility study and gave it to HRM.  Shortly after, HRM hired a consultant to do a feasibility study, which came to essentially the same conclusion.  “We could have done it for $25,000 instead of the $75,000 they gave the consultant!” laughs Susanna Fuller, a member of the Imagine Bloomfield Board of Directors.  “The lesson is that the public can come up with an alternative solution.  Plus, you end up with a stronger community.”

Ryan echoes the benefits for the Fall River community,  “It's huge!  We have an engaged community.  People are working together to create their own festival, and database of volunteers.  People are re-energized, and celebrating the good work of the community as a whole.”

The Fall River and Bloomfield processes are both examples of participatory design.  One of the key benefits of participatory design is that it allows conflicting stakeholders to work through problems:  by engaging with each other participants have the opportunity to expand their perspective and change viewpoints. 

“There certainly is a case for participatory design,” says Jill Grant, professor at Dalhousie's School of Planning.  “[Examples show] it works best at the small scale, where people are working on a local problem.  At that scale, residents [can] see the impacts of their actions and take responsibility.”  

Of course, there are downsides to participatory design processes.  First, they take time.  Developing a design or plan can take years, and politics tend to work in shorter time period.  Also, they take a lot of volunteer time from citizens, and many people do not have a plethora of spare time to offer unpaid.  Finally, collaborative design necessitates flexibility – a person might think they have the best idea, but then it combines with another, goes off on a tangent, meets new material, and blooms unrecognisable – not easy for everybody.

Which brings us back to the Halifax Common.  Originally, it was a wetland, a scrubby floodplain for Freshwater Brook, where people could pasture their animals.  As the population increased and the area urbanized, notions of appropriate use and the politics of land management became more complex.   Today, it is a central park, thoroughfare, and, according to HRM’s new plan, will soon be $600 000 more mega-concert friendly.  HRM’s plan includes a hard, permanent sub-surface under some areas of the grass to it more adaptable to concerts and seating.

Some Halifax residents feel the Common’s focus should not be on Big Name shows that shut off the public space for concerts you need a ticket to get into, but there’s currently no space for meaningful dialogue on the subject. 

“What if the civic-minded could put their energy into construction rather than opposition and frustration?” wonders Fuller.  What if a collaborative design process had been used to create the Common plan?  “What combination of softball, community garden, stream restoration, concert venue, art installation, lounging, doggie heaven would Halifax come up with?  How far could the citizenry make $3 million go?”


Socialize:
Want more grassroots coverage?
Join the Media Co-op today.
Topics: Environment

About the poster

Trusted by 5 other users.
Has posted 138 times.
View Hillary's profile »

Recent Posts:

picture of Hillary

Hillary (Hillary Bain Lindsay)
Halifax
Member since November 2008

About:


983 words

Comments

Commons

I live right next to the commons and I really hate when the concets start getting put up. I would love to see the commons be developed into a "Central Park" kinda atmosphere, where people can go chill out under a tree and not be worried about getting hit by a baseball or getting shoo'd away but concert construction guys.

North Park Street says yeehaw!

Great blogpost Ms Fax.

3 million eh?  I'm envisioning a community garden, a central pavillion where that ugly goddam fountain is (with a graffiti/movie screening wall), a nice public bathroom (there's one there, but it ain't pretty, or unlocked most of the time for that matter), a bunch of dog poop bag dispensers, a wind turbine (there's your power hookup for mega concerts!), and maybe even a couple of trees!

Of course, that's just my opinion... 

 

Hfx. Commons

It would seem like the name itself....Halifax COMMONS....would be indicative of a common approach to planning as well as a common use.  Are rock concerts what most people commonly go to or participate in?  I don't think so.  Of course, I'm one of the aging baby-boomers who does not in general appreciate the booming of loud concerts.  

Give me a natural space, with trees and greenery and so on, needing little maintenance and watering (other than heaven-given rainfall) to walk on, play on, roll on, lay on.  And actually, I'm willing to compromise for those of the younger generation who have the energy and motivation....how about a huge community garden!  

LIstening to CBC "As It Happens ", the other evening I was so inspired by the Detroit high school student who was working and talking about her high school's farm (YES, right in the midst of the past mega-car capital of the USA).  They have goats, chickens, rabbits, ducks, vegetable and fruit gardens and the students work and plant and feed the animals and even build the barn....in Detroit, Michigan.  Word is the mayor of Detroit wants to turn alot of the vacant land (vacant from the economic crunch) into farm land.  What a sweet idea...as well as very smart.  His vision is that Detroit will produce all (well let's say most) of its food.  Why not Halifax?  Why not begin with a nice garden plot in the Halifax Commons?  Maybe even some chickens and a few roosters...ahhh, to wake up to the sound of a rooster crowing.  What a delight!

 

 

Join the media co-op today
Things the Media Co-op does: Support
Things the Media Co-op does: Report
Things the Media Co-op does: Network
Things the Media Co-op does: Educate
Things the Media Co-op does: Discover
Things the Media Co-op does: Cooperate
Things the Media Co-op does: Build
Things the Media Co-op does: Amplify

User login


Google+
Subscribe to the Dominion $25/year

The Media Co-op's flagship publication features in-depth reporting, original art, and the best grassroots news from across Canada and beyond. Sign up now!